Find and stop AI compliance risks
Promise
AI sovereignty and gap-free compliance – fully local and audit-ready.
Imagine facing any audit – by external auditors, regulators, or a major new customer – completely at ease, because the proof that every AI usage runs compliantly is already on hand, instead of being painstakingly assembled after the fact. That is exactly the legal certainty the EU AI Act Compliance Shield delivers on top of DAOS: drive AI projects forward with an innovation mindset, freed from the fear of fines, data leaks, internal misuse, or a nasty surprise in the next audit – without having to become a compliance expert yourself.
The compliance shield protects twice over: from the outside against runaway compliance overhead, fines, and audit workload – and from the inside against misuse by your own employees, because every use stays technically bound to role, purpose, and data access.
The challenge
- Looming fines without provability: The EU AI Act demands gap-free transparency and documentation. Without automated logging, it's hard to prove which agent worked when, with which data, and which model.
- Data-leak risk from shadow AI: Employees paste sensitive customer data into prompts of foreign cloud AIs because there's no secure, approved alternative – every instance a potential GDPR breach.
- Misuse by your own employees stays invisible: Without technical enforcement, employees run AI agents outside their authority or reach data they were never cleared for – it usually only surfaces once damage is done.
- Decision paralysis from month-long reviews: New AI initiatives stall because legal and IT-security reviews take weeks to months for lack of standardized processes.
Our answer
The answer is a turnkey, highly secure AI infrastructure that runs entirely in-house and turns compliance from an innovation brake into an accelerator. Local data residency keeps sensitive information within your own boundaries, gap-free audit trails produce the required evidence automatically, and a system-wide enforced policy framework removes the need to review every new initiative individually. Compliance regulation happens semi- or fully automatically during operation. The same policy engine also stops employees from running AI agents outside their role or data access – protection outward and inward from a single system.
Illustrative representation – not a real data flow.
Challenge
Our answer
What's behind it
DAOS Policy Engine
Central enforcement of policies at system, user, and workload level – prevents misuse by your own employees instead of merely communicating rules.
Local-first architecture
Fully local operation prioritized, so no data crosses the sovereignty boundary and shadow AI loses its foundation.
Automated audit trails
Gap-free logging of which agent acted when, with which data and which model – audit readiness at the push of a button.
Post-quantum encryption (Kyber-1024)
Protection of all API keys and sensitive secrets to NIST Level 5 standard as the technical foundation for data security.
Before & after
Without the compliance shield
- Evidence is painstakingly assembled by hand when it counts.
- Sensitive data flows uncontrolled to external cloud AIs.
- Non-approved models cannot be prevented technically.
- Employees can overstep permissions without anyone noticing.
- Approvals take months and block the business unit.
With DAOS
- Audit readiness at the push of a button via gap-free trails.
- Data stays local, within your own boundaries.
- Model allowlists block non-approved models automatically.
- Role-based policies technically prevent unauthorized access.
- Standardized security templates – approval in hours, not months.
Post-quantum encryption to Kyber-1024 (NIST Level 5) secures API keys and secrets – a technical foundation that goes beyond the pure documentation obligation.
What compliance really costs
Plain tool or kit prices only show a slice of it: what's usually missing is the internal review time legal and IT security spend per initiative – and the ongoing effort of adapting the system to new requirements.
Calculator: real compliance costs
Estimate the actual annual cost of your AI compliance – including internal review time, not just the tool price.
How we get this number
8 initiatives × 75 hrs × €75 = €45,000 internal review time, plus €64,000 external consulting/audits = €109,000 per year of classic, manual compliance effort.
Illustrative estimate based on your inputs – not a binding offer and no fine or risk simulation.
Use cases
From enforcing new policies company-wide to security clearances for resources: the policy rollout and resource classification use cases walk through the scenarios in detail.
Check how audit-ready your AI usage is today – get in touch or book a slot directly for a first compliance assessment.